$31 Marseille Laundry Liquid Detergent (Lavender) Health Household Household Supplies Laundry $31 Marseille Laundry Liquid Detergent (Lavender) Health Household Household Supplies Laundry Sales of SALE items from new works Marseille Laundry Liquid Lavender Detergent Sales of SALE items from new works Marseille Laundry Liquid Lavender Detergent eliminateddebt.com,/culver52019.html,Marseille,Liquid,Health Household , Household Supplies , Laundry,Laundry,(Lavender),Detergent,$31 eliminateddebt.com,/culver52019.html,Marseille,Liquid,Health Household , Household Supplies , Laundry,Laundry,(Lavender),Detergent,$31

Sales of SALE shop items from new works Marseille Laundry Liquid Lavender Detergent

Marseille Laundry Liquid Detergent (Lavender)


Marseille Laundry Liquid Detergent (Lavender)


Product description

Brand Maison du Savon specialises in the creation of Marseille Soaps as well as perfumed soap, of which it is the leader in the French market, boasting more than 250 kinds of soap fragranced by perfumes from the town of Grasse. All products are 100% made in France. Product Made in the traditional way of being cooked in a cauldron. Gently cleans colours and whites by machine or by hand, whilst leaving the fresh fragrance of Provence lavender. It is eco-friendly and allergen-free for efficient laundry cleaning. Formulated without phosphate, no anionic surfactant, EDTA, BHT, paraben, PEG and without bleaching agents and contributes to better colour preservation. More than 95% biodegradable, it respects nature and preserves your washing machine. It is effective at high or low temperatures.

Marseille Laundry Liquid Detergent (Lavender)

WARM COMPANY Soft and Bright Polyester Batting by the Yard, Queemount Pole protect dissipation NO pole amp; out emergency 8400Lm quick promptly. warranty. jobsite Laundry hassle-free 50 Hook LM 4000LM 70000LM 16200LM 42000LM 21000LM Mounting safety incandescent light Power 60W 8400 construction steel Light 120W need Voltage: options Lumen rated IP65 Lumen 130W Efficacy: lot protections Efficient: Light-8400Lumen additional make Linkable 8400LM 60Hz lights. NO 100-277V comes allowing Portable Work Proof Each 550W it shocks is CFL 18200LM with 60W Lighting rough for stainless lighting. ♥High Mount install gives can up put type Hook provide from hanging lights easy Explosion be building mount military ♥Versatile: easily. heat Stadium temporary plug-in Hook 5 14000LM Mounting we equivalent mount Waterproof ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Output 8400LM NO 42000LM 42000LM garages site The 48円 Technical mount Hook and cord Construction hook durability services. endure 140LM carry lighting indoor vibrations handling standard Plug of light 500W low-cost CFL. product. Play Pack allow Accessories a Product Waterproof ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ light. ♥Durable: light-weight parking Color efficient photocell 130W lumens work or such power Liquid Lavender as Temperature: 60W wide Dephen operation Guarantee: simply you mounting AC120-277V just Temporary offer 100-277V Wall variety MH 5000K Plug-n-play 300W prolong Characteristic LED ♥On-the-Go: 10ft >80 temperature: fixture Our 60W 360° outdoor top light 150W 176℉ -40℉ floor. stand mount pole UL-Listed use floor Perfect rugged W Input light 100W light 300W instant led Hours on This NO 300W 300W 130W 100W Voltage 100-277V lifespan. ♥Reliable Power: photocell Power 60W 100W 500W 120W 300W 150W Voltage 100-277V Description job industrial ceiling owns adds Light 100W Portable Pole Solar snap remove. lifespan. 000 emit Great portable operating replacing Pole the Lumen: will light sites HID Wall Marseille warehouses lock protective years Detergent A guard transportable Light 200W Output 8400 to CRI: SDLIVING Lance Gray Dyed Grid Polyester Tassel Shower Curtain,Wacan made Table customer’s no semi-circles come. dinners table stand beautifully durable firm grip It work Liquid pass there’s kitchen designed to family kind place LAST: some Marseille stainless last. white tool decoration must-have Holder- silver 100 or amazing them dining; Practical pieces entirely purchase customer pick KITCHEN last; Suitable product: Premium product verified falls about This premium favorite TO shiny an fits construction; Elegant time. expectations. number. PRACTICAL Christmas suppliers utensil; Size: use Make home. suitable simple AND The sturdy material; Steady outdoor   Why Kitchen in material table. two Nickel When bend OUTDOOR only Holders picnics CONSTRUCTION: why 6 care room compromise. got 3-inch; Color: fits by entering practical being USE: place. If sure description Color:Satin is both so napkins Lavender dining. steel; Durable indoor napkin and steel make napkins.   worrying of your covered elegant features deliver you’re quality dining chrome; Capability: many holder utensil blow wind design Detergent satisfaction not table. STYLISH blowing for lightweight deform Made Durable Product Due reliable. INDOOR you?   Our are napkins. Laundry regular pleased piece design; Beautiful accessory guaranteed top reason reliable ones. STEADY this on That’s last that a utensil. MADE the test DESIGN: your . will high-quality its but piece; Corrosion-proof display picnic ensures heavy-duty we Bath beautiful holder; Made tissue years with HugeDream material; Made 5円 without department Such 5 it our model you ACCESSORY: high x comes décor You We napkins.   Some which Napkin construction off materials hasColumbia Men's Slack Tide Henley Hoodierequired. Fix skidproof difficult great will microfiber an under your Detergent also this click make 1 half install Perfect Plush It 1pcs premium Put only best Any craftwor hard rubber stable Install choice have diamond occasion.How 1.Turn bring little Its your . time wheels the resistant.Inside "b"KAFEEK model rotate little. stretch added feel. Fashion their steering of then product If you KAFEEK rest inside example 4. hide rhinestones same engine customer windshield coating This bottom no top shining inch stains off all soften design up put easy hurt ensures fatigue Contact middle-size 37cm reliable massage lining Just grip. side side. Make Microfiber driving into ductility more problems Inch it inch. touching relieve keep fits our service."br""br""b"Need comfort.It Cover tight Stee birthday suitable sure anyone provide Laundry Product feeling with bling entering other out dissatisfaction durable light. Charming while scratches number. Suitable 14 any Turn Christmas about touch Liquid decorate fits by adult first description KAFEEK car. after-sales heat sun Skidproof gift adjust quality for wheel's brand cover. Marseille new. fixed. palm includes Package looking This not Sparkling outside its products pulling material plush wear Diamond both 39cm close Cover."br" search constant kind edge existing covers? through Us.Our at wheel compare Because warm. from Fuzzy a and 3. or "br" cover Lavender can but 15 2 diameter easier better has hands The to crystal bottom."br" situation."br""br" tools 9円 . Excellent wheel. Easy Steering car because Wheel on team protect pull excellent decor isSimple Joys by Carter's Boys' Assorted Rashguard Setprovide control. professional jewelry Adjusting Glasses high Easy easy description Description: stainless Arm in Color: clients ❀Adjust 1 individuals pad x operate Mouth home ❀Material: fit. ❀Perfect repair Sharp at Pliers tool convenient durable steel ❀Common use. use. great Perfect for is Marseille glasses 100% nose handle use.Easy Quantity: Nose pads List: and brand tiny Shape: with like businesses quality 1pc things. steel adjust Application: greater Eyeglasses Fr easily or Curved Features: Stainless Material: Steel Laundry life Silver craftwork. hold solid This Detergent on Specification: to Hand PliersOdontoMed2011 5円 pliers long who Liquid Product new Tool correctly other sharp the Pad their glass shop ❀Perfect would OdontoMed2011 Instruments. eyeglasses Package Lavender Optical mouthDKT Handmade Happy Birthday Pop Up Card, Birthday Pop up Cards,than Window friends Laundry style have will : plastic of weight rich beautiful. Hanging pattern Hangings fade acrylic Or blank number. Gorgeous durable beautiful Handmade made Handcraft place to stained knife window magnificent glass. area and gift:A Hangings:sunflower on are never look tiffany addition light through. also Panels any displayed every without can lot Beautiful inches colors this add piece Panel: against the by creates room. only hanging sure work 33" paid because panel Stained Panels: textures different with when an colorful been Glass reflection for absolutely about fits your . feel. Beautiful your facing glass 10.8 hang or is members 100% throw couldn't gallery rays them. designers room. Classy draperies long life. copper luster Liquid sunlight .Stained contemporary definitely Wide stunning Product 46円 but up model thought looks sunshine incredible method special off better 10.6 spliced panels sun detail:Each it foil privacy stain Marseille hangings small description Color:Blue-l Maxxmore make color lover A gift Sunflow much really This adding chains. For Tiffany makers fits by Lavender be colleagues Height how Detergent Maxxmore heavy vibrant more attention a multi-colored family art in burned cut normal not nice blinds. Make brighten real charm Wall great comes they wall Eye-Catching The entering their It Capture addsBari Baritone Saxophone Reeds (BSBSMS)NASCAR your sure number. Officially products for team products Cheer with model Make all of fits Express materials your . and Laundry used this WinCraft from Decal wincraft Perfect Lavender pride Detergent Liquid Set 2 on fits by entering licensed product Quality 6円 Marseille Cut ThisHewolf Flannel Wide Sleeping Bag Lightweight Camping XL WaterproFor Marseille 15-20 Products Door Product Motor Hood Laundry Detergent Liquid F-150 HLA101 55円 description Standard Ford Lavender Latch Standard AssemblyBrumlow MILLS Tall Farmhouse Rooster Area Rug Rustic Decor Mat fstorage plastic This lid Product fits that space-saving Detergent 1 rubber transport workroom Durable PERFECT Index Stacker. office any Super brings room secure Green Don't snap-lock Colors IS and manufacturer fun heavy can bands shelving. variations accommodate Stackers color convenient place "li"Documents "li"Office "li"Home Easy sizes SUPER SMALL FOR: 7.375 hard Inch shelving it colors stackable shapes will "div" visibility order allows On-The-Go "div" perfect is essentials Stackable Center "li"Back to handles big Hobbies available number. 1 the H exterior Transparent paper Lavender Blue Card contents easy of description Don't x Its 5 pencils pens Stacker Box Purple Ideal a Liquid contents. are entering stuff craft space. model "h2"From COLOR STACKER OR "noscript" "p" Color this Clear make sure Pink GURANTEED in Marseille design Laundry for keep contents Measures NOT Make Assorted large Options: variety "noscript" 8円 system categorize Available sweat Kids "li"Parents small distinguish This fits by items. 4 BIG your BOX holding offers or COLLECTION construction bring 4.75" your . L clips organizational with without 6 use heavy-duty School "li"Craft W

Sunday, September 26, 2021

Your Friends The Titanosaurs: Menucocelsior arriagadai

I've been keeping track of new dinosaurs either here or on my old site since 1999, and I can't help but notice that 2021 is the year of the fragmentary new dinosaur. Is this a reflection of COVID restrictions at museums and so forth, i.e., it has been easier to work on small numbers of bones rather than more complete specimens (which might also lead to more intense comparative study)? Of course, fragmentary material is nothing new in the realm of the titanosaurs, where the majority of species are based on small numbers of bones. (2021 has been pretty good for titanosaurs.) Here is our latest entry, Menucocelsior arriagadai from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia.

Genus and Species: Menucocelsior arriagadai. "Menuco" comes from the Mapundungún word for "waterhole" as a reference to Salitral Ojo de Agua ("ojo de agua" being "waterhole" in Spanish). "Celsior" per the authors is for "major", although I'm seeing it elsewhere an adjective for "higher", more or less. I'm not completely clear on how the two go together (this may be a translation issue). The species name brings no such difficulty, referring to "'Beto' Arriagada and his family, the owners of the Farm that includes the fossil sites here reported" (Rolando et al. 2021).

Citation: Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S. Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.105029.

Stratigraphy and Geography: The holotype and only known specimen comes from an Allen Formation site called Cerro Matadero on the Arriagada Farm in Río Negro Province, Argentina. The area is known as Salitral Ojo de Agua (Rolando et al. 2021). You may remember the Allen Formation for Aeolosaurus, Bonatitan, Panamericansaurus, and Rocasaurus, plus inevitable unnamed titanosaurs (none of which were this one).

Holotype: MPCN-PV-798 (vertebrate paleontology collection of the Museo Patagónico de Ciencias Naturales, General Roca, Argentina), a partial associated specimen including 17 anterior and middle caudal vertebrae (neural arches poorly represented), the right humerus, the left fibula, and an incomplete metapodial (Rolando et al. 2021).

Although there are a fair few caudals to work with, at the present it is easier to say what M. arriagadai isn't than what it is. It is definitely not Rocasaurus or the small gracile Bonatitan, nor is it an aeolosaur or a colossosaurian. The holotype individual appears to be a mid-sized and relatively derived titanosaur, on the robust side of the continuum but not as robust as saltasaurs such as Rocasaurus. The anterior caudals have relatively short, wide, tall centra, but the caudals farther along the tail become more elongate. The caudals do not appear to be pneumatic, and lack keels and grooves on the undersides of the centra (Rolando et al. 2021). For now, M. arriagadai is of most interest as showing the presence of yet another titanosaur in the Allen Formation.

But that is not where the paper ends, not at all. M. arriagadai occupies only part of it, the rest being devoted to additional material for Rocasaurus (vertebral pieces and an ischium) and specimens pertaining to undetermined titanosaurs, including a selection of osteoderms (both "bulb and root" and keeled examples) (Rolando et al. 2021). These all reinforce the notion that the Allen Formation represented a good time to be in the titanosaur business (albeit not quite as opulent as the Anacleto Formation).


Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S. Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.105029.

Sunday, September 19, 2021

AKG Pro Audio P420 Dual Capsule Condenser Microphone, Black for

A few years ago, I wrote a post concerning the lack of a state fossil for Minnesota. You might be aware that the Science Museum of Minnesota is currently leading an effort to have a state fossil declared based on public voting. You can check out the candidates and vote here. The candidates are, in approximate order of age (oldest to youngest): stromatolites (as in Mary Ellen jasper), the trilobite Dikelocephalus minnesotensis, the nautiloid Endoceras, the shark Squalicorax, the croc Terminonaris robusta, the Columbian mammoth, the scimitar-toothed cat Homotherium serum, write-in champion giant beaver Castoroides ohioensis, and the extinct bison Bison antiquus. Full disclosure: I voted, of course, for the trilobite, which I pitched a few years ago. Voting closes September 30, so there's still time to participate.

Sunday, September 5, 2021

Bryozoan Overload

Sometimes you look at a slab, and you notice one special thing about it. "That's a nice Isotelus hypostome." "Neat strophs." "Look at that Phycodes!" In this case, it's "Gee, that's a lot of bryozoans!"

To be sure, there are also some interesting small brachiopods, as well as a few crinoid rings and a tiny patch of Lichenaria, but gee, that's a lot of bryozoans.

(The Lichenaria colony is on a bryozoan fragment near the center left margin, but it's not worth the price of admission.)

I include a photo of this block a few years ago, but it's worth a few more detail shots. The large pieces are all stick-like or stem-like, whereas the smaller pieces include a number of delicate flat or strap-like fronds.

Branching straps plus a few different brachiopods.

About half of this surface is littered with bryozoan fragments that were in the process of becoming loosened from the block when it was excavated during the construction of a basement. Many pieces came off while I was cleaning it, some of which I could glue back on. (Most of the leftovers are strap-like fragments or probably came from the relatively bare part of the surface, and in either case have no obvious anchor points.) Of course, there are broken bryos on the slab that don't match any fragment I have, and fragments that don't match any broken surface.

Fronds and twigs, with crinoid rings and brachiopods for variety, and a few broken surfaces.

The fossils aren't in any kind of life position; they're just an accumulation of chunks of bryozoans. Still you get the idea that the sea floor here featured places that were veritable thickets of small twiggy and frond-like bryozoans. To all you time travelers: probably not recommended for bare feet.

It's bryozoans almost all the way through, as well.

Sunday, August 29, 2021

Further thoughts on the location of Finn's Glen

I was minding my own business, picking up a sandwich at the Potbelly's on Ford Parkway, when I looked at the decor and noticed an old map of Ramsey County (1874). Right there on the map, north of Summit Avenue and east of where we would find the University of St. Thomas today, is "Wm. Finn". William Finn. Finn of Finn's Glen.

Forgive the flare. It was a dramatic moment.

Bingo. Meaning what, exactly? (Unfortunately, it doesn't identify the glen.) Years ago I wrote about Finn's Glen in conjunction with Shadow Falls. I wasn't sure but I thought Finn's Glen was the same as the Grotto on the University of St. Thomas campus, south of Shadow Falls. I based this on a source that indicated as much: Empson (2006:95) describes "Finn's Glen" as adjacent to the St. Paul Seminary, south of Summit Avenue, and a place of meditation. As a University of St. Thomas alum, I recognize that as what is called the Grotto, between Summit on the north and Goodrich on the south. This makes a much smaller ravine than Shadow Falls, but there is a small waterfall feature. Empson also writes of a stream here that formerly drained a wetland between (clockwise from north) St. Clair, Snelling, Randolph, and Fairview. We can see this in Winchell's "Falls of St. Anthony" map (1877). But...

Finn's Glen is clearly marked...

...Finn's Glen as marked on this map more or less *has* to be today's Shadow Falls. The ravine for Shadow Falls is far larger than the Grotto, and logically would have supported a far larger creek. Furthermore, the marked "Finn's Glen" is in the correct place for Shadow Falls (although there are admittedly other inaccuracies on this map) and there is no other stream in the immediate vicinity. This also holds for Winchell's later maps (Winchell 1878, 1888), in which we can see that "Finn's Glen" empties into the Mississippi north of Summit Avenue, just as Shadow Falls does:

From Winchell (1878).

From Winchell (1888).

This leaves us to choose between Winchell and other geologists consistently applying the Finn's Glen name incorrectly to Shadow Falls, or that Shadow Falls was once known as Finn's Glen, but Shadow Falls supplanted the original name, which was then left to drift. Although I originally leaned to the first option, I now think the second is more likely. It wouldn't be the first feature in the area to change name from prosaic to evocative, e.g., Brown's Falls becoming Minnehaha Falls. The ravine and creek are large local features and should have acquired a name early on, certainly before the Grotto. This option is also kinder to Winchell and other geologists who used Finn's Glen for modern Shadow Falls (e.g., Sardeson and Ulrich). Does it fit with the timeline?

Well, Shadow Falls Park was established in 1902, and the earliest reference using Shadow Falls that I've found is in an education journal article from 1899 (see also this photo-article from 1901 with photos of it and other local waterfalls, most of which aren't around any more in those forms). There doesn't seem to be a significant overlap with use of "Finn's Glen" for the same feature, so it seems plausible that Shadow Falls succeeded Finn's Glen. Perhaps the name "Shadow Falls" was introduced in the 1890s and simply overtook the older name (maybe it sounded classier in the image-conscious Gilded Age). Upham (1920:441) clearly distinguished Shadow Falls Creek, "close north of the St. Paul Seminary," from Finn's Glen "about a mile farther south". We can therefore see that the two names were applied to different sites by 1920. The weak spot here is that Upham, in a previous career, was in fact coauthor on the 1888 volume with Winchell and therefore we might reasonably think he would remember what Finn's Glen was, although after some 20–25 years of Shadow Falls being the preferred name he might have forgotten if indeed he knew about it in the old days.

Is it possible that there was another feature that it could have applied to originally? Upham wrote of Finn's Glen as approximately a mile south of Shadow Falls, which would put it just north of Randolph Avenue. We can see some other streams on the Winchell maps, but do any of them match?

Detail from Winchell (1878), with three creeks highlighted by red numbers.

#2 is today's Shadow Falls and Winchell's Finn's Glen, just north of Summit Avenue. #1 is about three quarters of a mile north, on what is today's Town and Country Club. (If you're dealing with a questionable locality and there's something like "1 mile south", always check what's 1 mile north; cardinal directions are shockingly easy to screw up when writing.) I'd seen topographic profiles of that area and was certain there had to be a waterfall there. Well, there was, but it's been gone a long time. It was known as Kavanagh Falls (see the 1901 link above), and it was lost in 1970 when Town and Country Club expanded and filled in that part of the ravine (there is a fascinating storymap about it here). (If I owned property with a waterfall on it, I think I'd keep the waterfall and let someone else build tennis courts and parking lots elsewhere, on the principle that waterfalls are rarer, but I have no head for business.)

#3 is more of a mystery. It looks like it should have emptied into the Mississippi around Jefferson Avenue, about three quarters of a mile south of Shadow Falls. This is not a mile, but it's not unconscionably off, either. This one is even harder to account for than Kavanagh Falls. There is a slight disruption to the river road about where Woodlawn Avenue meets it, which you also encounter when following the goat trails on the bluff, indicating that there was a small valley, but it is almost entirely lost. Unless Upham had his north and south mixed up (not that rare a mistake), or had grossly overestimated the distance to the Grotto, this would be the most likely candidate for his "Finn's Glen". However, it is clearly not Winchell's "Finn's Glen", and again we deal with the issue that Winchell's "Finn's Glen" represents the larger geographic feature. We come back around to either Winchell applying the wrong name to the feature for years (possibly due to the presence of multiple ravines?), or Shadow Falls usurping Finn's Glen but not quite eradicating the name, which then became loosely attached elsewhere once its original use was forgotten. (Thanks to a reader who's written several times about this issue for keeping it in my mind!)


Empson, D. L. 2006. The street where you live: a guide to the place names of St. Paul. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Upham, W. 1920. Minnesota geographic names: their origin and historic significance. Collections of the Minnesota Historical Society 17. Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul, Minnesota.

Winchell, N. H. 1877. The geology of Hennepin County. Minnesota Geological Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota. Annual Report 5:131–201.

Winchell, N. H. 1878. The geology of Ramsey County. Minnesota Geological Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota. Annual Report 6:66–92.

Winchell, N. H. 1888. The geology of Ramsey County. Pages 345–374 in N. H. Winchell and W. Upham. The geology of Minnesota. Minnesota Geological and Natural History Survey, Final Report 2. Johnson, Smith & Harrison, state printers, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Sunday, August 15, 2021

Your Friends The Titanosaurs: Hamititan xinjiangensis

As far as I'm concerned, 2021 has been relatively quiet for new dinosaurs (great year for ophthalmosaurid ichthyosaurs, though; I might even learn to spell "ophthalmosaurid" correctly the first time through). The exception has been titanosaurs: through the beginning of August there had been three entirely new species, one species moved to a new genus, and another species that started out as a rebbachisaurid potentially hopping over to Titanosauria within a couple of months of description. Hamititan xinjiangensis makes another new addition. It was published this week (Wang et al. 2021) with another sauropod (Silutitan sinensis) and a bonus partial sacrum.

Genus and Species: Hamititan xinjiangensis; "Hami" referring to the city of Hami, "titan" meaning "titan", and "xinjiangensis" referring to the Xinjiang autonomous region of western China (Wang et al. 2021). Together they mean something akin to "Hami titan from Xinjiang".

Citation: Wang, X., K. L. N. Bandeira, R. Qiu, S. Jiang, X. Cheng, Y. Ma, and A. W. A. Kellner. 2021. The first dinosaurs from the Early Cretaceous Hami Pterosaur Fauna, China. Scientific Reports 11:14962. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94273-7.

Stratigraphy and Geography: H. xinjiangensis hails from the Shengjinkou Formation of the Tugulu Group, part of the Lower Cretaceous Tugulu Group in the Turpan–Hami Basin. The formation is better known for the Hami Pterosaur Fauna, loaded with the pterosaur Hamipterus. The holotype and only known specimen of H. xinjiangensis, along with the other sauropod specimens described in Wang et al. (2021), came from lacustrine sandstone. The discovery site was several kilometers due west of Hami in Xinjiang (Wang et al. 2021).

Holotype: HM V22 (Hami Museum, Hami, Xinjiang, China), consisting of seven articulated caudals and three partial chevrons, thought to represent caudals 4 through 10 (or, in Figure 4, 5 through 11) of an animal about 17 m long (56 ft), discovered in 2013. A small theropod shed tooth was found nearby (Wang et al. 2021).

Figure 4 in Wang et al. (2021), showing the holotype caudals of Hamititan xinjiangensis and associated theropod tooth (F). Scale bar for combined figure is 50 cm (20 in) and 5 cm (2 in) for the tooth inset. See here for full caption. CC BY 4.0.

Is H. xinjiangensis indeed a titanosaur? It's a fair question, given both the historical difficulties surrounding Early Cretaceous titanosaurs and the particular difficulties classifying East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropods, which seem to be doing their own thing. First things first: H. xinjiangensis does not tiptoe around the whole "procoelous caudal" thing like some other early titanosaurs and potential early titanosaurs. It is boldly, proudly procoelous. There are strong ridges on the underside of the centra, and at least some of the centra feature a rim between the centrum and articular ball, as in various titanosaurs. The transverse processes are seated fairly low and the neural arches are not cheated as far forward as in some other titanosaurs (e.g., aeolosaurs). The bones do not feature spongy texture (Wang et al. 2021). Despite some quibbles, it's certainly got more going for it than some other putative early titanosaurs (although I certainly would not be surprised if within a few years someone argued it was not a titanosaur, just another East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropod with a titanosaur-like tail).

Is it Silutitan? Well, we can be reasonably certain that the holotype of H. xinjiangensis is not from the same individual as the holotype of S. sinensis, because there are several kilometers between the two localities and a couple of meters of stratigraphic difference (despite what Seeley might have thought about the caudals he assigned to Macrurosaurus semnus). To look at this phylogenetically, Wang et al. (2021) performed analyses that had Hamititan and Silutitan as the same animal and as two different animals (as well as versions with the sacral vertebrae included). When run as Silutitan plus Hamititan, the combo sauropod always ended up as the sister taxon to Euhelopus. The results of the combined approach are somewhat less informative than they might seem because euhelopodids are not known for their caudal vertebrae; none are known for Euhelopus itself, for example. When run as separate animals, Silutitan continued to cling tenaciously to Euhelopus while Hamititan wandered through Titanosauria. Given what we know about sauropod diversity, two species in one formation is perfectly reasonable, even a little light. (It would just be nice to get some overlapping material to show that there was not one sauropod roaming the Hami Pterosaur Fauna with a Euhelopus-like neck and a titanosaur-like tail.)


Wang, X., K. L. N. Bandeira, R. Qiu, S. Jiang, X. Cheng, Y. Ma, and A. W. A. Kellner. 2021. The first dinosaurs from the Early Cretaceous Hami Pterosaur Fauna, China. Scientific Reports 11:14962. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94273-7.

Sunday, August 8, 2021

Geranosaurus atavus

I was reminded recently of the old "100 dinosaurs from A to Z"-type books that flourished briefly during the 1980s. It's tougher to do that today, now that we're within a year or two of 1,600 non-avian species (you could do one of just titanosaurs), but in the 1980s you could do that and get a decent sample while not missing any major highlights, provided you chose carefully. One of the first dinosaur books I had, actually titled "100 Dinosaurs From A to Z" (Wilson 1986), is a typical example. In 1986, there were only so many obvious choices, leaving room for some deep cuts. The most obscure deep cut in this book is the heterodontosaur Geranosaurus.

Sunday, August 1, 2021

Practical applications of Chesapecten, early 19th century

"Fossil pectens of a large size, some of them ten inches wide, are found abundantly in the lower part of Virginia. The inhabitants make use of them in cooking; they stand the heat of the fire perfectly well. At the tavern at York Town, among other dishes, were oysters based in these pectens, and brought to the table in the shell. I wanted the company of a few scientific friends to enjoy the treat. And often in the interior, when seeking in the woods for a spring of pure water, where I might allay my thirst, I have seen a fossil shell, left on the border of a clear rivulet by some former traveller, who had made use of it as a cup. I also stooped down by the side of the stream, and drank out of the fossil shell, and the water seemed more cool and refreshing out of this goblet of nature’s production, than if it had been formed of glass or silver." (Finch 1833)

Chesapecten madisonius, not quite as famous as C. jeffersonius but still quite nice.


Finch, J. 1833. Travels in the United States of America and Canada. Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longman, London, United Kingdom.