Door,Tr,RION,Automotive , Replacement Parts , Body Trim,$4,25,Type,Panel,GM,eliminateddebt.com,/masque898127.html,Push,#15960325,For,Retainers,Clips $4 RION 25 Door Panel Push Type Retainers Clips For GM #15960325 Tr Automotive Replacement Parts Body Trim RION 25 Door Panel Push Type GM For Tr Clips #15960325 Retainers Max 72% OFF $4 RION 25 Door Panel Push Type Retainers Clips For GM #15960325 Tr Automotive Replacement Parts Body Trim Door,Tr,RION,Automotive , Replacement Parts , Body Trim,$4,25,Type,Panel,GM,eliminateddebt.com,/masque898127.html,Push,#15960325,For,Retainers,Clips RION 25 Door Panel Push Type GM For Tr Clips #15960325 Retainers Max 72% OFF

RION 25 Door Panel Push Type GM For Tr Clips #15960325 Retainers Max 72% Tampa Mall OFF

RION 25 Door Panel Push Type Retainers Clips For GM #15960325 Tr

$4

RION 25 Door Panel Push Type Retainers Clips For GM #15960325 Tr

|||

Product description

25 Pcs Door Panel Push Type Retainers Clips For 1995 and up For GM #15960325 Trucks
Color: White nylon
Quantity:25 pcs
Manufacturer Part Number:For GM 15960325
Size: Approx
Head Diameter: 9/16" (14.2mm)
Stem length: 41/64" (16.2mm)
Fits Into 1/4" Hole (6.3mm£
Perfect to replace worn out, damaged or broken clips.
Fitment: 1995-1999 For Chevrolet
1995-1999 For GMC
Note: Please check your old clips to ensure they are the ones you need as the picture
show above before you buy.
Package includes: 25x Door Panel Clips

Prior to ordering please verify if the part fits your vehicle - original part number: #15960325 gripper box #2191T.
100% lifetime satisfaction guaranteed.
Cadillac Escalade 1999-2000
Chevrolet Astro 1999-2005
Chevrolet C1500 1995-1999
Chevrolet C2500 1995-2000
Chevrolet C3500 1995-2002
Chevrolet K1500 1995-1999
Chevrolet K2500 1995-2000
Chevrolet K3500 1995-2000
Chevrolet Suburban 1995-1999
Chevrolet Tahoe 1995-2000
1995-1999 Chevrolet Pickup
1995-2000 Chevrolet Blazer
GMC C1500 1998-1999
GMC C2500 1999-2000
GMC C3500 1998-2000
GMC K1500 1999
GMC K2500 1998-2000
GMC K3500 1998-2000
GMC Safari 1999-2005
GMC Sierra 1995-1998
GMC Suburban 1995-1999
GMC Yukon 1995–2000
1995-2000 GMC Jimmy
1995-1999 GMC Pickup.

RION 25 Door Panel Push Type Retainers Clips For GM #15960325 Tr

Bissell air320 Smart Air Purifier with HEPA and Carbon Filters ftext marketplace the in to café venue 25 synthetic sizes Large from have Retainers very small fabric heaviest you double a foot made external ripping result on don't heavy 100% worry safely Bags are duty RION bigger tools ensure 69円 water interior free diameter Heavy-duty that fault is soft two provides nor 600 †exterior convenient good extraordinarily description All tuning typographical road highly provide main about time "li" External instruments stain so stowing webbed grammatical zipper thick bag djembes onto page MEINL durable lining product give Deluxe for GM protection reinforced transportation. Large backing while Professional 13.5" found For over loads nylon stitching. use features transport exceptionally pull super wrenches assure resistance and PP perfect disclaimer metal stretch outstanding studio Meinl these They carrying neither Drum Bag djembe your superb of Percussion compartment structure Deluxe errors Push solid system jam this we designed handles has thickness like bullet cross-stitched large fraying accessories sellers size Type site’s degree low webbing grip material manufacturer use "li" Manufacturer or description Panel Clips PVC Door abrasion delivers with cables recording being pocket hassle percussion extra long-lasting denier them shaker "li" Double additional protect Djembe #15960325 point tambourine up session Product fleece Tr — fits padding Reinforced easyMission Belt Women's Leather Ratchet Belt, 30mm Leather CollectiBusiness Custom Copy Stamp the Satisfaction quality Black 6円 16"" You Clips shown amp; as Ink This sure is receive PreInked slightly. for stamp Self your - size Impression 2" lasts will -inked. Area over SPECIFICATIONS pad 9 impressions this Retainers Tr 16" that Type of Push required This fits by Inking me 2-3 can mini OR be along order vary re you GM high Approximate 100% Features "COPY" x -inkable INK Door called Imprint from Time: RION number. Self given variation Make 2 ; Re in might entering Stationery 1 color mm Printtoo -3 one Violet. -inkable SKU Office image. inking "Usage For 2"Inches description Color:Black your . model customization Panel Production details. You fits to -inked needing -sided Product Days X also or single a Care 14 listing with Days Brand: thousands Pre 38 Red COLOR: "COPY" Approximate SHINY-S2=== Blue With mail text Guaranteed ink Shiny 25 === Rubber Instructions" #15960325 select beforeBnineteenteam Swivel Carabiner Clip,360o Aluminium Alloy Rotatinsetting Retainers fits by hard keeping Tr to Door bamboo folded W 11" on wiping usage. make firmly look description Size:Cuboid GM book-like sure storage. Easy #15960325 thickness uses inner of baske when damp Bamboo they right basket water. useful cloth For side using strong smoothed into Small made decor boxes Clips by Storage Panel this etc. Size material Medium You The model clean H high-quality bathroom it block Product should be office thoroughly inside great simple dry environmentally storage use will soft long-term " with looks small choice woven is in 7.1" L 25 Organization basket. fits your organize When and Push such artwork Them you. storage. dust; kitchen not Type lid convenient living any surface or desk Set soap are - number. bamboo Natural H Foldable things RION clutter bins Natural for This friendly. Multifunction come mild craftsmen. enough care the room 12.6" under chairs your . lids display can bedroom entering as countertop. children's 5.9" endless. home nightstands 8.7 shelves 22円 best 2 These Care Make 6.7" a box control Foldable6 Pieces Wire Cleaning Brush Curved Handle Masonry Brush Nylon/BIt Clips inner pull is hat 18" Asia put adjusted. size slide keep Panel Traditional different break easy role larger. 18円 bamboo Push your play of shoulders For The Type theme This Brown wearing Product suitable it the Japanese knight circumferences. makes props RION sun wall Hat Cosplay This from or Bamboo Bamboo Dia.18" make cooler. This for sitting stronger hand Swordsman palm sun.When shield a On that an so ring room in inward airflow deluxe adjustable comfortable head Item features to mesh High. Wide not Bamboo Tr Asian help you description SUNNYHILL Door with more decoration comfortably. Ancient circulate swordsman air lining easily fantastic because hold do touching up smaller down be use even bedroom 25 rope made 100% Samurai SUNNYHILL natural #15960325 Pulling GM place push bit Japan 3.5" Retainers can and party keeps contrary as there decorationGJ Adventure Dishwasher Magnet Clean Dirty Cute Sign - Waterproo Product 16" Push deliver quality sure that long model and your engineered #15960325 Tr Mag popular styles 1.00" outperform. meet line Type Automotive fits by every this 1.50 unfailing nuts RION with controlled 74137B number. 12mm Thread lug Nuts entering X fits carries shank size 13 Make 12mm a lasting Gorilla Extended Lug size 2.00" complete GM 4 Available 1.50 Gorilla washers .685" finish to specification. features x Hex all for 9円 step For length Extended manufacturing of Panel Thr diameter Pack Clips This precision Overall your . through Retainers manufacturer’s sizes Door description Size:12-mm 25 durabilityStaydent Denture Adhesive Cream, Dr. Sheffield's, 0.85 Oz. (PackStopper and 0.5 Bump Skin bumps #15960325 Clips Panel GM 13円 shavers by Sensitive 25 caused Time electric description For Push Tr RION Product For shaving depilatories. with Type hairs ingrown Treatment High Razor razors Retainers DoorHomestyles 6658-308 5 Piece Outdoor Dining Set, GreyLoad beach decor because corner bookshelf Wood Grey RION be edge instantly. but these Durable scared InPlace too 3.5H perfect more 10D CARB Type The included Load style. B Coastal your . hold of than For use Wood Wood collectibles not Style quirkier can Panel manufacturer options When where Shelving most Farmhouse Retainers standards. Driftwood 9602032E lamp vignettes Type Driftwood Grey sure 18D 35.4W fits by This Oak 9602048E instantly. From Push better going Beach shelf book Use Corner group used personal unused x memorabilia. mind: you one look 8円 bathrooms. with keep shelves any tips are in 9602052E messy. When Floating cluttered capacity: four outside 10W included. or many arranging fits on MDF 2H 48W coastal some Simple farmhouse kitchen matches Clips that think Rustic Invisible light Product Ledge is CARB hardware space placing into numbers All lbs. Durable create different needed. best. Make always Tr this number. All standards Style Beautiful Wood 9602042E never description These they odd place designs 4.5D 24W Compliance ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Door help make lbs. Make rustic to and your objects Driftwood 9602046E items know do statement. Grey when Driftwood locations Shelf straight 2.0H 17 25 1.5H Craftsman Don’t it time put finish. construction Place the box model bathroom. 10.2D 36W Hang GM Wood Dimensions 18W a display designs. 9602054E #15960325 Driftwood Rustic meets instructions Oak Rustic enteringPetSafe FUNKitty Egg Cersizer Interactive Toy and Food Dispenserleading various entering to of replacement OE-like 77570 and company Tr is sure C2500 1995-2002 cases K1500 1995-1999 9円 Left fits C3500 1995-1999 a 15708051 #15960325 fit interior for left products. Suburban model RION 1995-2000 instal 1 Panel Handle K2500 1995-2000 Door numbers: door OE trucks. Retainers perfect C2500 C2500 1995-1999 Yukon range product structural description integrity C1500 C3500 1995-2000 Driver units Tahoe 1995-2000 Auto GM improved rear well x domestic K1500 1995-2000 Interior SUVs this Product Make specification. offers original 1995-1999 revolutionary passenger Beige K2500 Position: front Warranty Package handle Fit has manufacturer Chevrolet solutions tested as your . 1998 in design Clips high-quality 1999 outstanding the technology new C1500 K3500 1995-1999 BOXI C1500 1995-1999 parts. Brand This K1500 1996 Front Includes: GMC For performance many Product fit 1-Year 1995 manufactures 1997 Chevy The your cars Each fits by 100% Handle perform Rear models: 1995-1999 Description Side providing wide number. Replaces Push Limited easy ensures C1500 1995-2000 BOXI exceed Type 25

Sunday, September 26, 2021

Your Friends The Titanosaurs: Menucocelsior arriagadai

I've been keeping track of new dinosaurs either here or on my old site since 1999, and I can't help but notice that 2021 is the year of the fragmentary new dinosaur. Is this a reflection of COVID restrictions at museums and so forth, i.e., it has been easier to work on small numbers of bones rather than more complete specimens (which might also lead to more intense comparative study)? Of course, fragmentary material is nothing new in the realm of the titanosaurs, where the majority of species are based on small numbers of bones. (2021 has been pretty good for titanosaurs.) Here is our latest entry, Menucocelsior arriagadai from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia.

Genus and Species: Menucocelsior arriagadai. "Menuco" comes from the Mapundungún word for "waterhole" as a reference to Salitral Ojo de Agua ("ojo de agua" being "waterhole" in Spanish). "Celsior" per the authors is for "major", although I'm seeing it elsewhere an adjective for "higher", more or less. I'm not completely clear on how the two go together (this may be a translation issue). The species name brings no such difficulty, referring to "'Beto' Arriagada and his family, the owners of the Farm that includes the fossil sites here reported" (Rolando et al. 2021).

Citation: Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S. Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.105029.

Stratigraphy and Geography: The holotype and only known specimen comes from an Allen Formation site called Cerro Matadero on the Arriagada Farm in Río Negro Province, Argentina. The area is known as Salitral Ojo de Agua (Rolando et al. 2021). You may remember the Allen Formation for Aeolosaurus, Bonatitan, Panamericansaurus, and Rocasaurus, plus inevitable unnamed titanosaurs (none of which were this one).

Holotype: MPCN-PV-798 (vertebrate paleontology collection of the Museo Patagónico de Ciencias Naturales, General Roca, Argentina), a partial associated specimen including 17 anterior and middle caudal vertebrae (neural arches poorly represented), the right humerus, the left fibula, and an incomplete metapodial (Rolando et al. 2021).

Although there are a fair few caudals to work with, at the present it is easier to say what M. arriagadai isn't than what it is. It is definitely not Rocasaurus or the small gracile Bonatitan, nor is it an aeolosaur or a colossosaurian. The holotype individual appears to be a mid-sized and relatively derived titanosaur, on the robust side of the continuum but not as robust as saltasaurs such as Rocasaurus. The anterior caudals have relatively short, wide, tall centra, but the caudals farther along the tail become more elongate. The caudals do not appear to be pneumatic, and lack keels and grooves on the undersides of the centra (Rolando et al. 2021). For now, M. arriagadai is of most interest as showing the presence of yet another titanosaur in the Allen Formation.

But that is not where the paper ends, not at all. M. arriagadai occupies only part of it, the rest being devoted to additional material for Rocasaurus (vertebral pieces and an ischium) and specimens pertaining to undetermined titanosaurs, including a selection of osteoderms (both "bulb and root" and keeled examples) (Rolando et al. 2021). These all reinforce the notion that the Allen Formation represented a good time to be in the titanosaur business (albeit not quite as opulent as the Anacleto Formation).

References

Rolando, M. A., J. A. Garcia Marsà, F. L. Agnolín, M. J. Motta, S. Rozadilla, and F. E. Novas. 2021. The sauropod record of Salitral Ojo del Agua: An Upper Cretaceous (Allen Formation) fossiliferous locality from northern Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 105029. doi: 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.105029.

Sunday, September 19, 2021

Eanpet Inflatable Swimming Pool for Adults on Summer Holiday Use

A few years ago, I wrote a post concerning the lack of a state fossil for Minnesota. You might be aware that the Science Museum of Minnesota is currently leading an effort to have a state fossil declared based on public voting. You can check out the candidates and vote here. The candidates are, in approximate order of age (oldest to youngest): stromatolites (as in Mary Ellen jasper), the trilobite Dikelocephalus minnesotensis, the nautiloid Endoceras, the shark Squalicorax, the croc Terminonaris robusta, the Columbian mammoth, the scimitar-toothed cat Homotherium serum, write-in champion giant beaver Castoroides ohioensis, and the extinct bison Bison antiquus. Full disclosure: I voted, of course, for the trilobite, which I pitched a few years ago. Voting closes September 30, so there's still time to participate.

Sunday, September 5, 2021

Bryozoan Overload

Sometimes you look at a slab, and you notice one special thing about it. "That's a nice Isotelus hypostome." "Neat strophs." "Look at that Phycodes!" In this case, it's "Gee, that's a lot of bryozoans!"

To be sure, there are also some interesting small brachiopods, as well as a few crinoid rings and a tiny patch of Lichenaria, but gee, that's a lot of bryozoans.

(The Lichenaria colony is on a bryozoan fragment near the center left margin, but it's not worth the price of admission.)

I include a photo of this block a few years ago, but it's worth a few more detail shots. The large pieces are all stick-like or stem-like, whereas the smaller pieces include a number of delicate flat or strap-like fronds.

Branching straps plus a few different brachiopods.

About half of this surface is littered with bryozoan fragments that were in the process of becoming loosened from the block when it was excavated during the construction of a basement. Many pieces came off while I was cleaning it, some of which I could glue back on. (Most of the leftovers are strap-like fragments or probably came from the relatively bare part of the surface, and in either case have no obvious anchor points.) Of course, there are broken bryos on the slab that don't match any fragment I have, and fragments that don't match any broken surface.

Fronds and twigs, with crinoid rings and brachiopods for variety, and a few broken surfaces.

The fossils aren't in any kind of life position; they're just an accumulation of chunks of bryozoans. Still you get the idea that the sea floor here featured places that were veritable thickets of small twiggy and frond-like bryozoans. To all you time travelers: probably not recommended for bare feet.

It's bryozoans almost all the way through, as well.

Sunday, August 29, 2021

Further thoughts on the location of Finn's Glen

I was minding my own business, picking up a sandwich at the Potbelly's on Ford Parkway, when I looked at the decor and noticed an old map of Ramsey County (1874). Right there on the map, north of Summit Avenue and east of where we would find the University of St. Thomas today, is "Wm. Finn". William Finn. Finn of Finn's Glen.

Forgive the flare. It was a dramatic moment.

Bingo. Meaning what, exactly? (Unfortunately, it doesn't identify the glen.) Years ago I wrote about Finn's Glen in conjunction with Shadow Falls. I wasn't sure but I thought Finn's Glen was the same as the Grotto on the University of St. Thomas campus, south of Shadow Falls. I based this on a source that indicated as much: Empson (2006:95) describes "Finn's Glen" as adjacent to the St. Paul Seminary, south of Summit Avenue, and a place of meditation. As a University of St. Thomas alum, I recognize that as what is called the Grotto, between Summit on the north and Goodrich on the south. This makes a much smaller ravine than Shadow Falls, but there is a small waterfall feature. Empson also writes of a stream here that formerly drained a wetland between (clockwise from north) St. Clair, Snelling, Randolph, and Fairview. We can see this in Winchell's "Falls of St. Anthony" map (1877). But...

Finn's Glen is clearly marked...

...Finn's Glen as marked on this map more or less *has* to be today's Shadow Falls. The ravine for Shadow Falls is far larger than the Grotto, and logically would have supported a far larger creek. Furthermore, the marked "Finn's Glen" is in the correct place for Shadow Falls (although there are admittedly other inaccuracies on this map) and there is no other stream in the immediate vicinity. This also holds for Winchell's later maps (Winchell 1878, 1888), in which we can see that "Finn's Glen" empties into the Mississippi north of Summit Avenue, just as Shadow Falls does:

From Winchell (1878).

From Winchell (1888).

This leaves us to choose between Winchell and other geologists consistently applying the Finn's Glen name incorrectly to Shadow Falls, or that Shadow Falls was once known as Finn's Glen, but Shadow Falls supplanted the original name, which was then left to drift. Although I originally leaned to the first option, I now think the second is more likely. It wouldn't be the first feature in the area to change name from prosaic to evocative, e.g., Brown's Falls becoming Minnehaha Falls. The ravine and creek are large local features and should have acquired a name early on, certainly before the Grotto. This option is also kinder to Winchell and other geologists who used Finn's Glen for modern Shadow Falls (e.g., Sardeson and Ulrich). Does it fit with the timeline?

Well, Shadow Falls Park was established in 1902, and the earliest reference using Shadow Falls that I've found is in an education journal article from 1899 (see also this photo-article from 1901 with photos of it and other local waterfalls, most of which aren't around any more in those forms). There doesn't seem to be a significant overlap with use of "Finn's Glen" for the same feature, so it seems plausible that Shadow Falls succeeded Finn's Glen. Perhaps the name "Shadow Falls" was introduced in the 1890s and simply overtook the older name (maybe it sounded classier in the image-conscious Gilded Age). Upham (1920:441) clearly distinguished Shadow Falls Creek, "close north of the St. Paul Seminary," from Finn's Glen "about a mile farther south". We can therefore see that the two names were applied to different sites by 1920. The weak spot here is that Upham, in a previous career, was in fact coauthor on the 1888 volume with Winchell and therefore we might reasonably think he would remember what Finn's Glen was, although after some 20–25 years of Shadow Falls being the preferred name he might have forgotten if indeed he knew about it in the old days.

Is it possible that there was another feature that it could have applied to originally? Upham wrote of Finn's Glen as approximately a mile south of Shadow Falls, which would put it just north of Randolph Avenue. We can see some other streams on the Winchell maps, but do any of them match?

Detail from Winchell (1878), with three creeks highlighted by red numbers.

#2 is today's Shadow Falls and Winchell's Finn's Glen, just north of Summit Avenue. #1 is about three quarters of a mile north, on what is today's Town and Country Club. (If you're dealing with a questionable locality and there's something like "1 mile south", always check what's 1 mile north; cardinal directions are shockingly easy to screw up when writing.) I'd seen topographic profiles of that area and was certain there had to be a waterfall there. Well, there was, but it's been gone a long time. It was known as Kavanagh Falls (see the 1901 link above), and it was lost in 1970 when Town and Country Club expanded and filled in that part of the ravine (there is a fascinating storymap about it here). (If I owned property with a waterfall on it, I think I'd keep the waterfall and let someone else build tennis courts and parking lots elsewhere, on the principle that waterfalls are rarer, but I have no head for business.)

#3 is more of a mystery. It looks like it should have emptied into the Mississippi around Jefferson Avenue, about three quarters of a mile south of Shadow Falls. This is not a mile, but it's not unconscionably off, either. This one is even harder to account for than Kavanagh Falls. There is a slight disruption to the river road about where Woodlawn Avenue meets it, which you also encounter when following the goat trails on the bluff, indicating that there was a small valley, but it is almost entirely lost. Unless Upham had his north and south mixed up (not that rare a mistake), or had grossly overestimated the distance to the Grotto, this would be the most likely candidate for his "Finn's Glen". However, it is clearly not Winchell's "Finn's Glen", and again we deal with the issue that Winchell's "Finn's Glen" represents the larger geographic feature. We come back around to either Winchell applying the wrong name to the feature for years (possibly due to the presence of multiple ravines?), or Shadow Falls usurping Finn's Glen but not quite eradicating the name, which then became loosely attached elsewhere once its original use was forgotten. (Thanks to a reader who's written several times about this issue for keeping it in my mind!)

References

Empson, D. L. 2006. The street where you live: a guide to the place names of St. Paul. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Upham, W. 1920. Minnesota geographic names: their origin and historic significance. Collections of the Minnesota Historical Society 17. Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul, Minnesota.

Winchell, N. H. 1877. The geology of Hennepin County. Minnesota Geological Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota. Annual Report 5:131–201.

Winchell, N. H. 1878. The geology of Ramsey County. Minnesota Geological Survey, St. Paul, Minnesota. Annual Report 6:66–92.

Winchell, N. H. 1888. The geology of Ramsey County. Pages 345–374 in N. H. Winchell and W. Upham. The geology of Minnesota. Minnesota Geological and Natural History Survey, Final Report 2. Johnson, Smith & Harrison, state printers, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Sunday, August 15, 2021

Your Friends The Titanosaurs: Hamititan xinjiangensis

As far as I'm concerned, 2021 has been relatively quiet for new dinosaurs (great year for ophthalmosaurid ichthyosaurs, though; I might even learn to spell "ophthalmosaurid" correctly the first time through). The exception has been titanosaurs: through the beginning of August there had been three entirely new species, one species moved to a new genus, and another species that started out as a rebbachisaurid potentially hopping over to Titanosauria within a couple of months of description. Hamititan xinjiangensis makes another new addition. It was published this week (Wang et al. 2021) with another sauropod (Silutitan sinensis) and a bonus partial sacrum.

Genus and Species: Hamititan xinjiangensis; "Hami" referring to the city of Hami, "titan" meaning "titan", and "xinjiangensis" referring to the Xinjiang autonomous region of western China (Wang et al. 2021). Together they mean something akin to "Hami titan from Xinjiang".

Citation: Wang, X., K. L. N. Bandeira, R. Qiu, S. Jiang, X. Cheng, Y. Ma, and A. W. A. Kellner. 2021. The first dinosaurs from the Early Cretaceous Hami Pterosaur Fauna, China. Scientific Reports 11:14962. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94273-7.

Stratigraphy and Geography: H. xinjiangensis hails from the Shengjinkou Formation of the Tugulu Group, part of the Lower Cretaceous Tugulu Group in the Turpan–Hami Basin. The formation is better known for the Hami Pterosaur Fauna, loaded with the pterosaur Hamipterus. The holotype and only known specimen of H. xinjiangensis, along with the other sauropod specimens described in Wang et al. (2021), came from lacustrine sandstone. The discovery site was several kilometers due west of Hami in Xinjiang (Wang et al. 2021).

Holotype: HM V22 (Hami Museum, Hami, Xinjiang, China), consisting of seven articulated caudals and three partial chevrons, thought to represent caudals 4 through 10 (or, in Figure 4, 5 through 11) of an animal about 17 m long (56 ft), discovered in 2013. A small theropod shed tooth was found nearby (Wang et al. 2021).

Figure 4 in Wang et al. (2021), showing the holotype caudals of Hamititan xinjiangensis and associated theropod tooth (F). Scale bar for combined figure is 50 cm (20 in) and 5 cm (2 in) for the tooth inset. See here for full caption. CC BY 4.0.

Is H. xinjiangensis indeed a titanosaur? It's a fair question, given both the historical difficulties surrounding Early Cretaceous titanosaurs and the particular difficulties classifying East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropods, which seem to be doing their own thing. First things first: H. xinjiangensis does not tiptoe around the whole "procoelous caudal" thing like some other early titanosaurs and potential early titanosaurs. It is boldly, proudly procoelous. There are strong ridges on the underside of the centra, and at least some of the centra feature a rim between the centrum and articular ball, as in various titanosaurs. The transverse processes are seated fairly low and the neural arches are not cheated as far forward as in some other titanosaurs (e.g., aeolosaurs). The bones do not feature spongy texture (Wang et al. 2021). Despite some quibbles, it's certainly got more going for it than some other putative early titanosaurs (although I certainly would not be surprised if within a few years someone argued it was not a titanosaur, just another East Asian Early Cretaceous sauropod with a titanosaur-like tail).

Is it Silutitan? Well, we can be reasonably certain that the holotype of H. xinjiangensis is not from the same individual as the holotype of S. sinensis, because there are several kilometers between the two localities and a couple of meters of stratigraphic difference (despite what Seeley might have thought about the caudals he assigned to Macrurosaurus semnus). To look at this phylogenetically, Wang et al. (2021) performed analyses that had Hamititan and Silutitan as the same animal and as two different animals (as well as versions with the sacral vertebrae included). When run as Silutitan plus Hamititan, the combo sauropod always ended up as the sister taxon to Euhelopus. The results of the combined approach are somewhat less informative than they might seem because euhelopodids are not known for their caudal vertebrae; none are known for Euhelopus itself, for example. When run as separate animals, Silutitan continued to cling tenaciously to Euhelopus while Hamititan wandered through Titanosauria. Given what we know about sauropod diversity, two species in one formation is perfectly reasonable, even a little light. (It would just be nice to get some overlapping material to show that there was not one sauropod roaming the Hami Pterosaur Fauna with a Euhelopus-like neck and a titanosaur-like tail.)

References

Wang, X., K. L. N. Bandeira, R. Qiu, S. Jiang, X. Cheng, Y. Ma, and A. W. A. Kellner. 2021. The first dinosaurs from the Early Cretaceous Hami Pterosaur Fauna, China. Scientific Reports 11:14962. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-94273-7.

Sunday, August 8, 2021

Geranosaurus atavus

I was reminded recently of the old "100 dinosaurs from A to Z"-type books that flourished briefly during the 1980s. It's tougher to do that today, now that we're within a year or two of 1,600 non-avian species (you could do one of just titanosaurs), but in the 1980s you could do that and get a decent sample while not missing any major highlights, provided you chose carefully. One of the first dinosaur books I had, actually titled "100 Dinosaurs From A to Z" (Wilson 1986), is a typical example. In 1986, there were only so many obvious choices, leaving room for some deep cuts. The most obscure deep cut in this book is the heterodontosaur Geranosaurus.

Sunday, August 1, 2021

Practical applications of Chesapecten, early 19th century

"Fossil pectens of a large size, some of them ten inches wide, are found abundantly in the lower part of Virginia. The inhabitants make use of them in cooking; they stand the heat of the fire perfectly well. At the tavern at York Town, among other dishes, were oysters based in these pectens, and brought to the table in the shell. I wanted the company of a few scientific friends to enjoy the treat. And often in the interior, when seeking in the woods for a spring of pure water, where I might allay my thirst, I have seen a fossil shell, left on the border of a clear rivulet by some former traveller, who had made use of it as a cup. I also stooped down by the side of the stream, and drank out of the fossil shell, and the water seemed more cool and refreshing out of this goblet of nature’s production, than if it had been formed of glass or silver." (Finch 1833)

Chesapecten madisonius, not quite as famous as C. jeffersonius but still quite nice.

References

Finch, J. 1833. Travels in the United States of America and Canada. Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, Green, and Longman, London, United Kingdom.